New key figure for land-relatedness

where does the milk money come from?
The milk money is our income.
If we produce in a more luxurious/sustainable way, who will force the nzo to pay more for our milk?
Without this coercion, the dairy farmer's income will fall even more when these expert committee's recommendations are implemented.

Neighborhood contracts is that one-way traffic? I mean cattle farmer on the grounds of arable farmer or can also have a both/and story. It is now officially not possible to exchange land with regard to the gecom. assignments. Farmers now have to make invoices for each other so as not to get into trouble.

Maybe it's good that BB adjusts the background photo. Corn is not done!!

Another worthless commission most of these 5 dairy farmers are farmers without a successor who have been stuck with the plush of the board chair for years

LTO and NZO are putting on big pants. The milk price will have to rise considerably to be able to afford the dairy farmers their feed from their own land or surroundings! Until now, the crops with bloody low hectare balances compared to arable crops
Or is NZO secretly hoping to curb the supply so as not to drown in milk?! And LTO is happy to help them because of the good decoration for the stage, but at the expense of many members and their families!

this pushes the sector further into capital-intensity. Who will be our successors later? This component should also be part of the foundation of a sustainable livestock farming plan. What am I saying? This seems to me to be a crucial part of the foundation.
With friends like that you don't need an enemy anymore. Please may I be invited to the next club, because as sympathetic as it may seem, this is again of no use to us and it also comes from the sector itself.
ps This proposal is not a problem for our company, but I like to think a bit more macro.

I think it's about arable farming and livestock farming working together more. Arable farming "at the service of livestock". Arable farming prices are not always great either, working together can be an added value. Exchanging soil (crop rotation) with each other is part of this.

The strange thing about this agreement is that the use by many farmers of cattle manure on their locally grown wheat is not viewed as sustainable use.
Apparently new agreements now have to be made, in which especially the amount of grassland must increase again.
From the environmental perspective, it is expected that the amount of feed and manure flows will decrease with this new approach. It would have been better if LTO and NZO had already looked at the 'problem' of feed and manure transport from the perspective of the way in which current Dutch arable farming contributes to this.

supplement;

Not only contribution of arable farming to dairy farmers but also to the pig and chicken sector.

supplement;

Not only contribution of arable farming to dairy farmers but also to the pig and chicken sector.

An idea from the NAV. Allowing unlimited protein-containing raw materials is not sustainable for the agricultural sector in the Netherlands.